A global vision for nutrition and sustainability
By 2050, every person could access nutritious, culturally appropriate food while helping the environment. The 2025 EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets From Sustainable Food Systems proposes a “planetary health diet” as a solution.
The report finds that combining this diet with sustainable farming and reduced food waste could feed 9.6 billion people fairly. Researchers from more than 35 countries contributed, showing that global food-related greenhouse gas emissions could fall by over half if nations act together.
Currently, about 30% of emissions come from producing, processing, and transporting food, with most of the remainder from fossil fuel use and clearing forests for farmland.
Key elements of the planetary health diet
The diet emphasizes fruits, vegetables, whole grains, legumes, and nuts. It allows moderate meat and dairy while limiting added sugar, salt, and saturated fat. “This diet benefits both people and the planet,” said Dr. Walter Willett of Harvard University.
He recommends one daily serving of dairy and one serving of animal protein, such as fish, poultry, or eggs. Red meat, including beef and pork, should be limited to a 4-ounce serving per week. “It’s balanced, flexible, and similar to the Mediterranean diet,” Willett said.
Changing diets is only part of the solution
Johan Rockström, co-chair of the commission and director of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, said diet alone is not enough. “We also need to reduce food waste and adopt sustainable land, water, and ecosystem management,” he explained. “Healthy food must be affordable and accessible to everyone.”
Industry pushback and misinformation
The 2019 EAT-Lancet report estimated that adopting the planetary health diet globally could prevent 11.6 million premature deaths annually. The 2025 update raises that number to 15 million. In the U.S., about 31% of premature adult deaths could be avoided.
Transforming the global food system could save $5 trillion annually by lowering health costs, restoring ecosystems, and slowing climate change. The required investment — $200 to $500 billion — is small compared to the potential benefits.
Opposition has returned, particularly from meat and dairy industries. Campaigns like #YestoMeat spread misinformation in 2019, and similar tactics are resurfacing. “Some groups promote meat-heavy diets while minimizing livestock’s climate impact,” Willett said. “Our report relies on independent, global science.”
The consequences of doing nothing
If current practices continue, agricultural emissions could rise by 33% by 2050. Nearly 70% of ecosystems have already lost more than half of their natural areas, mostly due to farming.
Following the planetary health diet could cut emissions by 60% compared with 2020 levels. Cattle numbers would drop by 26%, freeing 11% of grazing land. “This could help prevent further deforestation in the Amazon,” Willett said.
Aquatic food production could increase by 46%, vegetables by 42%, fruits by 61%, nuts by 172%, and legumes by 187%. Global food prices could fall about 3%.
Building a fair and sustainable food system
Christina Hicks of Lancaster University said the wealthiest 30% of people cause over 70% of food-related environmental damage. Fewer than 1% currently meet their food needs without harming the planet.
The commission recommends shifting subsidies from meat and dairy to sustainable crops like fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Governments could also tax foods high in sugar, salt, or saturated fats while improving purchasing power to make healthy diets affordable.
Willett added that many traditional plant-based diets already follow planetary health principles. “We are not prescribing one global diet,” he said. “This approach respects cultural diversity and allows every region to eat well while protecting the planet.”
